Talk:Renaissance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Renaissance article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 12 months |
Renaissance was one of the History good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This level-3 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Semi-protected edit request on 19 January 2024
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Suggested edit to the sentence "The term rinascita ("rebirth") first appeared in Giorgio Vasari's Lives of the Artists (c. 1550), anglicized as the Renaissance in the 1830s." in the introduction section of the article.
I suggest this be changed to "The term rinascita ("rebirth") first appeared in Giorgio Vasari's Lives of the Artists (c. 1550), the corresponding French word, renaissance, was adopted into English as the term for this period during the 1830s."
Why: The term 'renaissance' is not an anglicisation but a loan word from French, also meaning "rebirth". To be a pedant, "renascence" is technically the anglicised version, with usage from the 1720s. ResplendentMackerelSky (talk) 08:57, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Got any refs for that? Johnbod (talk) 17:07, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- The French word "Renaissance" was first used by Jules Michelet in the middle of the 19th century.[1]
- Done Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 11:32, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
crazy postmodernism: "View of Florence, birthplace of the Renaissance"
[edit]Hi,
Anybody who's interested in the topic "renaissance", will be startled to see a HDR image among the few illustrations in the article.
What is wrong with that?
Just that is is no illustration. It doesn't illustrate anything. But instead of the period's classic images someone was able to push his / her (his) photo and place a checkmark in his weekly to do list, like, "insert a pic in the wikipedia article ✔"
The physical location does matter, but we refer to is as Italy.
The view that today's tourists can capture really don't belong in this article...
Please think about this...
(I've gotto go now)
--peter.josvai (talk) 19:04, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Correct. The template already has an appropriate image representative of Renaissance. And image of modern Florence is already at a proper place down the article. --Altenmann >talk 18:33, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- ^ Jerry Brotton (2006). The Renaissance: A Very Short Introduction. OUP Oxford. p. 9. ISBN 978-0-19-280163-0.
- Delisted good articles
- Former good article nominees
- Old requests for peer review
- C-Class level-3 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-3 vital articles in History
- C-Class vital articles in History
- C-Class European history articles
- Top-importance European history articles
- All WikiProject European history pages
- C-Class history articles
- Top-importance history articles
- WikiProject History articles
- C-Class Middle Ages articles
- High-importance Middle Ages articles
- All WikiProject Middle Ages pages
- C-Class Philosophy articles
- High-importance Philosophy articles
- C-Class social and political philosophy articles
- High-importance social and political philosophy articles
- Social and political philosophy task force articles
- C-Class Medieval philosophy articles
- High-importance Medieval philosophy articles
- Medieval philosophy task force articles